May, 2010


14
May 10

The Faces of [Life and] Death

The death mask of Oliver Cromwell from the Lawrence Hutton Collection of Life and Death Masks at Princeton University Library

I’m constantly enchanted by little echoes we get from the past: fossils, old photographs and recordings, handwritten letters, etc.  There is an almost eerie feeling of being transported back in time when one takes the effort to scrutinize things like these, and it isn’t rare for me wwhile watching a movie or reading some other account to wonder just how minutely accurate a portrayal is.  My desire to see what it was actually like in the Middle Ages or during the Revolutionary War is sometimes palpable, my descent into despair expedient.  The past is, in many ways, utterly unreachable.

Maybe that’s why The Lawrence Hutton Collection of Life and Death Masks intrigued me so much when I happened upon it yesterday.  Paintings of famous people are all well and good, but here we have the most accurate physical representations, actual plaster casts of the faces of some titanic historical figures, Benjamin Franklin, Oliver Cromwell, George Washington, and Leo Tolstoy among them along with many others.  I find myself obsessed with the changing human form, and it seems oddly inconceivable to me that a person living hundreds of years ago was physically much like any one of us.  Granted, that’s a cognitive disconnect brought about by unbridgeable distance, but I find it no less interesting to consider.

I wish we had a much larger repository of these to peruse, though I do find this collection pretty astounding.

(Side note:  some of the plasters included in this collection are actually life masks, but most are not.)

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

13
May 10

FOLLOW UP: Bad Reporting on Acupuncture

Just a little update on my last post.

As I suspected, Science-Based Medicine and Dr. Novella picked up the slack on the primary study cited by the NewScientist article I recently criticized.  The first part of Dr. Novella’s post deals with the paper that claimed acupuncture provided a neuroprotective effect and aided recovery (in a rat model) from induced spinal injury, and he came to similar conclusions regarding the media reporting:

The bottom line with this study is that it provides weak evidence for a very extraordinary claim. It is of no practical use unless and until it is independently replicated with proper blinding. If you believe what you read in the media, however, you would be led to the conclusion that spinal injured patients could be made to walk again simply by sticking needles into magical locations on their body.

He also discusses another recent study plagued by related issues and echoes the fact that electroacupuncture cannot be considered true acupuncture:

Further, this study mixed acupuncture with “electroacupuncture.” I strongly maintain that there is no such thing as “electroacupunture” – it is, rather, the application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation through an acupuncture needle. This is no more acupuncture than the application of morphine through a hollow acupuncture needle should be considered acupuncture.

I highly recommend reading the full text of Dr. Novella’s post on this.  Naturally, he provides a much deeper insight into the issues at hand than I do.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

11
May 10

What the Hell Is Up with English Political Party Websites?

I’ve been following the general election in England for the past few days, and today I decided to take a look at the official website for the three big political partys over on that side of the pond. Below are some of my thoughts on the sites…

1. Labour – The best of the three, but that is not saying much. The design of this site is very simple, and it looks more like the Web 2.0 web than the other two. I’d give it a B- as a grade.

2. The Conservatives – This site is a very… uhm… conservative (I guess) site. The design is really stupid. The layout is really stupid. Ick. What the hell is up with that picture of David Cameron? Seriously. It makes me think this is a website for people who are confused and angry about it. F is for Fail.

3. The Liberal-Democrats – This party, which seems to appeal to the nerds more than the other two, needs to work on its website. It is decent, but it is a far cry from good. I think that some slick web head needs to tell this party what is up. The grade I’d give it is a C.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

11
May 10

5-11-2010 Reading List.

I found a few articles today that I think are really interesting.

1. The Search for Universal Music, by Philip Ball .

All cultures make music, though no one knows why; it’s not obviously useful in the way cooking or language are. A number of musicians, including some notable composers, claim that music is a universal form of human communication which transcends barriers of culture and language. Now psychologists are putting this universality back on the agenda, and are investigating whether certain elements of music are hard-wired into the brain.

2. To Be or Not To Be, Brendan Kelly.

An interesting article on death and suicide in King County:

A total of 13,339 people died in King County in 2008. (The data for 2009 hasn’t been tabulated yet.) Sixteen percent of them—2,121 people—became cases for the county Medical Examiner’s Office: 85 were murdered, 163 died in traffic accidents, and 210 committed suicide. Of the suicides, 93 shot themselves. (In the same year, there were 45 gun-related murders: If you’re going to die by gunfire in these parts, you’ll most likely be pulling the trigger.) Forty-eight hanged themselves. Twenty-nine took drugs or poison. Thirteen died from jumping, eight from asphyxia, five from cutting or stabbing, four from carbon-monoxide poisoning, three from drowning, another three from self-immolation, and four from “other.”

3. We Need a General Theory of Individuality, by David P. Barash.

Needed, an oxymoron: a general scientific theory of individual differences. To focus upon individuality is to celebrate particularity, whereas any general theory must, by definition, submerge the individual case in a wider sea of pattern. Each of us cherishes our own separate, individual personhood, making much of the “fact” that we are different from everyone else (while also insisting, of course, that we aren’t all that different). But attention to individual differences runs the risk of being unscientific, insofar as science aims at generalizing, raising our heads above the individual trees to recognize the forest. Yet the need is there. When Kierkegaard insisted that his tombstone say “That Individual,” he was identifying both an existential truth and a profound scientific dilemma.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email