Infrastructure


13
Aug 10

I Like Maps

The Set Up:

For as long as I can remember I have loved maps. I can clearly remember getting an atlas of the world as a Christmas gift one year and being totally awestruck. I can remember taking long car trips with my parents (prior to their divorce) and flipping the pages of the Rand McNally.

Why do I find maps so engaging? Why do I adore them so much? Don’t really know, to tell you the truth… and I stopped asking why a long time ago.

One of the things the internet has shown me is that I’m not the only non-cartographer map enthusiast in the world. I am, in fact, one person in a somewhat large (but widely dispersed) subculture.

And it is as a member of this map-head subculture that I bring you…

Four Links for Map-Heads:

1. A very good list of links to interesting maps via Kottle.org. Jason Kottle is one of those early bloggers who continues to put out really interesting stuff via his “liberal arts 2.0″ blog. This list of maps is one of the many great things you will find there on a daily basis. If you enjoy this list you should consider becoming a regular reader of Kottle.org.

One of the mpas ffrom the list at Kottke.org's "Ahoy maps" post.

2. The Strange Maps site of Frank Jacobs is rather awesome. From the about page of that site…

Frank Jacobs loves maps, but finds most atlases too predictable. He collects and comments on all kinds of intriguing maps—real, fictional, and what-if ones—and has been writing the Strange Maps blog since 2006, first on WordPress and now for Big Think. His map “US States Renamed For Countries With Similar GDPs” has been viewed more than 587,000 times.

Via: Strange Maps

3. The KICKMap is something that I heard about via one of the many RSS fees I read.  It is something that is truly wonderful.

From the about the KICKMap page…

The Kick Map is designed to get more people to ride New York City’s subway system. Created with clarity and ease of use, it allows riders to navigate this vast system easily and without uncertainty. The subway map is the key to understanding this most complex subway in the world, which has 26 separate lines and 468 stations. A well-designed map not only welcomes and empowers novices to use the subway but also encourages additional use for regular “home-to-work-only” commuters to use the subway for recreational destinations where they might otherwise take a car. For this reason the design of the subway map can directly influence ridership numbers and can indirectly have an effect on New York’s traffic congestion and pollution. In short, a better-designed subway map will make our subway system more open and accessible.

This can be downloaded as an iPhone app.  There is a “lite” free version and a “full” paid version, and even though I don’t live anywhere near New York City, I bought it.  Why?  Because I’m a map-head.  I’m totally blown away by how great this map is, and I wish that there was a KICKMap for Chicago.

KICKMap

If you find the idea of effectively mapping complex cities (or maps in general) even remotely interesting you should at the very least look at the map comparison section of the KICKMap site.

4. The last thing I want to link to is a book from O’Reilly Media called Beautiful Visualization.

Book cover of Beautiful Visualization

From the discription of this book…

With contributions from more than two dozen experts, this book demonstrates why visualizations are beautiful not only for their aesthetic design, but also for elegant layers of detail that efficiently generate insight and new understanding. Think of the familiar map of the New York City subway system, or a diagram of the human brain. These older examples have been surpassed artists, designers, commentators, scientists, analysts, statisticians, and others who show how visualizations using today’s digital capabilities can help us make sense of the world.

Maps take many forms but are essentially visualizations of information.  This is a really interesting book if you are a map-head.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

5
Aug 10

Thoughts on the Mobile Web, Pt. 2: “Unlocked” Phones

I’ve been reading lots of people’s thoughts on why the Nexus One not being as widely adopted as other phones like the iPhone is a failure for unlocked phones.

My reaction to that: Bullshit.

Defining “Unlocked” phone:

The Nexus One is a damn fine bit of hardware, and while you can buy it with out locking into a contract it is not really unlocked.

Why do I say that? Simple, the way that I choose to define “unlocked phone” is:

An expensive communication device paid for in full by the customer.  The fact that the customer has paid 100% of the cost of this device out of his/her pocket would prevent said customer from being locked into one carrier’s set of plans for any length of time and would also prevent said customer from being locked into using any one carrier’s wireless infrastructure because this expensive device would be equipped with a radio that allowed it to acces all carriers’ wireless infrastructures.

In essence, what I’m saying is that I believe a truly unlocked phone would allow the customer to go to any carrier and say, “I bought this phone with out any help from you, but I’m willing to pay you [insert price here] dollars a month for this device to have access to your wireless infrastructure.  If I’m ever dissatisfied with the service of your company or the performance of your company’s wireless infrastructure I’ll stop paying you and take my phone and pay a different carrier I think will perform better than you do.”

A Partially Locked Phone:

Back to the Nexus One.  It’s true that this device could be bought with out a contact to use a carrier’s wireless infrastructure for a period of time, meaning the customer could ditch the carrier at any point without paying any sort of early “early termination” fees, which tend to be rather high.  However, the lack of termination fees does not really matter because the Nexus One’s radio would only work with one carrier’s wireless infrastructure.  So even though the customer did avoid a contract and the “early termination” fees that went along with those contracts, the phone (and the customer) were locked in because they could not take the phone to another carrier.

i.e. A person could spend around $500.00 to get a phone that would only work with one carrier’s wireless infrastructure, and opting out of using said carrier would also mean opting out of using the device.  Full stop.

That is a partially locked phone.  Not an unlocked phone.

A real unlocked phone will prevent a customer from being locked in to a contract, and also prevent the customer from being locked into a carrier.

So while the partially locked Nexus One being sold directly by Google might not have worked out the way that Google wanted and could be seen as a failure for Google, it could also be seen as a failure for the sale of partially locked phones. I don’t think it can be seen as a failure for unlocked phones.

A Comparison:

I want smart phones, in the way they access the mobile web, to be like computers and the way they access the internet.

A person would buy the hardware (computer) then take it to whatever internet service provider he or she wants to.

That makes sense right?

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email