Jason’s Discoveries


27
Jul 10

The Nature of Competition As Spiritual Hemorrhoid

So the Obama administration is presently hemorrhaging classified information courtesy of WikiLeaks, the Bush administration is doing so posthumously, the earth’s crust is hemorrhaging oil, and Tom Vilsack is simply battling an embarrassing case of hemorrhoids after/during the stress of the Shirley Sherrod debacle.  Those are the big stories at the moment, but in true form for a real live Twenty-First Century Narcissist, I’m not really thinking about all that right now.

Something terrible happened on Sunday at Dave & Buster’s… I lost.

In and of itself, losing is not a rarity in my life though I am, in general, more accustomed to winning.  But on Sunday evening, I lost in a big way.  I lost at everything.  Even now, my ego hasn’t restored itself, nor will the chasm be sated or filled by gobbling up Scrabble wins and cheap, trivial victories.  The merciless drubbings I received left me pithed like a dissected frog against a lab mat, immobile and dumb, twitching violently, wanting for an elusive victory at something, anything.

First, I absorbed two straight losses at what was essentially a free throw competition — something I don’t believe I’d ever lost until two nights ago — and then a demoralizing defeat at the Super Shot basketball game.  I was put away handily on the air hockey table by a score of 7-2, at the trivia board three straight times in a row, and I managed to die before my partner in two co-op campaigns on Terminator: Salvation and House of the Dead 4.  I am still surprised I avoided making a hellish scene and tearing some poor child’s arms off in a rabid, ego-fueled frenzy.  There is nothing that incites a petulant rage quite like the perturbation of the competitive spirit, and in my twenty-six years of competing at various events, I have never taken the prospect lightly, which has cost me more than one enjoyable evening playing Taboo or Risk with friends.  (The two remaining teams in a game of risk cannot enter into an alliance with the intention of ending the game in a truce when other armies have been exhausted.  The game must be played to the death.  The incident that spawned this aside happened nearly two years ago and serves as a cautionary tale to all Risk players that treaty restrictions must be stipulated before the game, and in the interest of competition, alliances should generally be disallowed.)  I did manage to win the Daytona racing game, but there isn’t much satisfaction in placing first when the difficulty is set to Easy, the transmission to Automatic, and the game itself is a subpar racer made by SEGA in 1994.

Whether this rage is the justifiable product of primate evolution or a pathetic shard of the male ego still buried in my amygdala (probably both), I almost never see the point in playing “for fun”.  Playing for fun is playing to win, and the fun comes as a by-product of real competition, not half-assed lollygagging through a novel activity.  I don’t want any mealy-mouthed “the fun is in the journey” platitudes either.  The journey isn’t fun unless you care about the destination, and if you don’t care about the destination, why take the journey?  This isn’t to say that I’m always an unreasonable loser, but most people who know will probably tell you that I’m certainly not a tranquil one.  I’d be loathe to disagree with them publicly and at the risk of self-delusion.

But that’s just one asshole’s opinion, a maligned philosophy that emanates from a severely wounded ego, and if you must know, while I’d been planning to post on the site for a few days now, the only reason I got around to it this afternoon is because Master Gorman needled me this morning and pointed out that he was beating me easily in the post ratio.

Trust me, I’m bordering on illiterate right now as I’ve been staring dumbly at this computer screen for going on six hours with very little to do but ponder the slow waste of the world, the burden of being a vile loser, and the long-term implications of muscle atrophy.  I am in no condition to be blogging, and if you were looking for, you know, information, you’ve caught me on the wrong day.  If you catch me on the right day, you might get to read some better dressed gibberish, more eloquent bullshit.  You might not be subjected to such public conceit. (Neil, there will be actual content next time.  I promise.)

So for now, it’s time to suck down my private devastation and try to see the bigger picture.  Stare into the Hubble Deep Field image I’ve now made my desktop wallpaper and contemplate smallness for awhile.  Make this nightmare seem mercifully silly.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

14
May 10

The Faces of [Life and] Death

The death mask of Oliver Cromwell from the Lawrence Hutton Collection of Life and Death Masks at Princeton University Library

I’m constantly enchanted by little echoes we get from the past: fossils, old photographs and recordings, handwritten letters, etc.  There is an almost eerie feeling of being transported back in time when one takes the effort to scrutinize things like these, and it isn’t rare for me wwhile watching a movie or reading some other account to wonder just how minutely accurate a portrayal is.  My desire to see what it was actually like in the Middle Ages or during the Revolutionary War is sometimes palpable, my descent into despair expedient.  The past is, in many ways, utterly unreachable.

Maybe that’s why The Lawrence Hutton Collection of Life and Death Masks intrigued me so much when I happened upon it yesterday.  Paintings of famous people are all well and good, but here we have the most accurate physical representations, actual plaster casts of the faces of some titanic historical figures, Benjamin Franklin, Oliver Cromwell, George Washington, and Leo Tolstoy among them along with many others.  I find myself obsessed with the changing human form, and it seems oddly inconceivable to me that a person living hundreds of years ago was physically much like any one of us.  Granted, that’s a cognitive disconnect brought about by unbridgeable distance, but I find it no less interesting to consider.

I wish we had a much larger repository of these to peruse, though I do find this collection pretty astounding.

(Side note:  some of the plasters included in this collection are actually life masks, but most are not.)

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

13
May 10

FOLLOW UP: Bad Reporting on Acupuncture

Just a little update on my last post.

As I suspected, Science-Based Medicine and Dr. Novella picked up the slack on the primary study cited by the NewScientist article I recently criticized.  The first part of Dr. Novella’s post deals with the paper that claimed acupuncture provided a neuroprotective effect and aided recovery (in a rat model) from induced spinal injury, and he came to similar conclusions regarding the media reporting:

The bottom line with this study is that it provides weak evidence for a very extraordinary claim. It is of no practical use unless and until it is independently replicated with proper blinding. If you believe what you read in the media, however, you would be led to the conclusion that spinal injured patients could be made to walk again simply by sticking needles into magical locations on their body.

He also discusses another recent study plagued by related issues and echoes the fact that electroacupuncture cannot be considered true acupuncture:

Further, this study mixed acupuncture with “electroacupuncture.” I strongly maintain that there is no such thing as “electroacupunture” – it is, rather, the application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation through an acupuncture needle. This is no more acupuncture than the application of morphine through a hollow acupuncture needle should be considered acupuncture.

I highly recommend reading the full text of Dr. Novella’s post on this.  Naturally, he provides a much deeper insight into the issues at hand than I do.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

29
Apr 10

Bad Reporting on Acupuncture

http://www.flickr.com/photos/migrainechick/ / CC BY 2.0

So this article on the NewScientist website really chapped my ass.

It cites the publication of a new study that outlines successful use of acupuncture to treat spinal injuries induced in rats.  Now, I’m not a doctor, and I’m unable to access the full-text of the study in question.  My suspicions are that some qualified party will cite methodological issues, or more likely, the study will remain a footnote  in light of the overwhelming weight of evidence in favor of the interpretation that acupuncture possesses no therapeutic benefit beyond that of placebo. (Maybe not.  We’ll see, but I doubt it.)

From the article:

Acupuncture’s scientific credentials are growing. Trials show that it improves sensory and motor functions in people with spinal cord injuries.

Well, not really.  For a great review of the current literature regarding acupuncture and an even greater deal of irate bitching about a fishy article written by The YOU Docs, Drs. Mehmet Oz and Mike Roizen, I highly suggest reading an article on the subject written by Dr. Mark Crislip over at Science-Based Medicine.  In it he outlines the results of numerous systematic reviews of the medical literature as well as dubious claims made about the mechanisms by which acupuncture works its supposed magic.  It appears that Drs. Oz and Roizen are attracted to the mysticism surrounding traditional Chinese medicine.

(Harriet Hall has also written a very thorough overview of acupuncture.)

Furthermore, the scientific paper to which the NewScientist links in the blockquote (different than the paper the article is discussing) does not deal directly with traditional acupuncture but with electroacupuncture in which an electrical impulse is introduced to the nerve.  This is an actual intervention that will induce some type of physiological response and cannot be considered acupuncture as Dr. Crislip asserts in his piece.  It seems dishonest to equate the two since there is a big difference between simply placing a needle into someone’s skin and running an electrical current into their body.

Of further interest is another post by Dr. Steven Novella regarding the placebo effect, one of the more misunderstood health-related phenomenons due to the complexities of interpreting study results.  The standard perception goes like this:  you walk into the doctor complaining of pain, the doctor gives you a sugar pill that you think is a pain reliever, and because you believe you’ve received treatment, your brain responds in kind and ramps up the production of natural healers, presumably the immune system.  Viola!  You’re better, and you didn’t have to ingest any dangerous drugs.

As you’ll see when reading Dr. Novella’s article and the mostly excellent discussion on the comment board that follows, the placebo effect doesn’t really work that way.  Most of it can be chalked up to study artifacts, bad study design, and reporting biases on the part of both doctors and patients.  Without an objective way of measuring pain or nausea or other types of discomfort, many of these studies are hindered by the need for patients to fill out a pain evaluation, the results of which can vary greatly from study to study.

You’ll notice all of my links are from Science-Based Medicine.  So sue me.  They devote their time and energy to evaluating dubious claims and pseudoscience, and they are an absolutely fantastic resource for anyone interested in the complicated study of medicine.  At the very least, reading many of these posts should help elucidate why all-or-nothing claims made by various pseudoscientific outfits are silly and don’t incorporate a nuanced approach to the business of getting things as right as possible.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

27
Apr 10

Bill Nye Cleans House

Bill Nye - Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

I used to watch Bill Nye the Science Guy when I was a kid, and his show stands as probably the earliest discernible science-related influence I can remember.

Imagine my disappointment when I happened across Brian Dunning’s post over at Skepticblog that discusses Nye’s recent promotion of a cleaning product called Ionator from the company Activeion.  Essentially, the company has recruited Nye to endorse a line of water ionizers the cheapest of which is priced at $169 and the science behind which is unproven and dubious.

I’m not going to get into the debate over the science of their claims.  You can scroll through the comments on Skepticblog, which do a decent enough job of hashing out the quandaries, and you can read an article by Dr. Stephen Lower, a retired chemist from the Department of Chemistry at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, that Dunning links to and which discusses the general quackery of ionized water claimants and provides an interesting remedial chemistry lesson about the subject.

My overall impression is that at best, Activeion’s product is a ripoff that does what they say it does despite the fact that its effects could be achieved for a few dollars and without the aid of the ionizer, and at worst, it’s a pseudo-scientific scam.  (If you’re interested in specifics, I highly recommend reading the discussion.)

I don’t agree with Dunning’s reasoning that we should withhold judgment if Nye took up the job because of money woes.  If Bill Nye knowingly promoted snake oil, he has done so at the peril of his credibility within the skeptical community as a science advocate.  If he was duped, at least he wasn’t a witting scammer, but even so, it’s fair enough to say he should have vetted Activeion’s claims and checked with one of his many contacts that would have had access to pertinent knowledge.

Either way, my opinion of Nye is diminished.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

16
Mar 10

The Two Minutes Hate

Nineteen Eighty-Four ruined my life.  It’s one of my favorite books and not for the reasons many people erroneously reference it as the ultimate cautionary tale about surveillance, government intrusion, and herd mentality.  These were all prominent themes for Orwell, no doubt, but the book is more about the limits of the human spirit [vernacular] than anything else, and without spoiling the ending for those who haven’t read it, I will say the culmination of Nineteen Eighty-Four tore open a hole in me that will never be mended.  My life after the book bears the weight of an inherent void, a fallibility at once ugly and natural and unconquerable.

That might all sound depressing, but what I find most unfortunate is that the point of Nineteen Eighty-Four — and by extension George Orwell — has become synonymous with their assertions about Big Brother.  A book this good shouldn’t be used as shorthand for drumming up fear, and however astute Orwell seems in retrospect (and he does), we should appreciate the nuance of his work.

To those who have read the book and are fans, visit Two Minutes Hate and give Emmanuel Goldstein a piece of your mind.  If you’re too lazy to click the link, get your sixteen seconds hate below, but I warn you.  The effect is not the same.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

12
Mar 10

Internet Explorer 6: A Rotting Corpse of a Browser

IE6 Must Die

Attirbution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rohdesign/ / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Get off of it.  Don’t ask questions; just do it.

By now, it should be obvious to anyone with even a passing knowledge of better and more stable alternatives that Internet Explorer 6 is a husk of a web browser.  It is no more.  It has ceased to be.  Bereft of life, it rests in peace… You get the idea.

It used to be that IE6 was little more than a nuisance.  Sure, Firefox was better, and so were Safari and Opera, and it was a veritable pain in the ass to have to write conditional CSS simply to cater to those folks clinging to a browser released with Windows XP in 2001, but while these nuisances existed, for a long time, they were not so egregious as they are now.  In my worthless opinion, the browser battle really comes down to a face-off between Firefox and Chrome.  IE8 and Opera can’t hold a candle to them, and while Safari has undergone some nice improvements, I don’t think it’s in the same league.

That’s not what I’m on about here, though.  The rise of HTML5 is going to bring with it a number of innovations that will require the operational power of the newer and more robust browsers, and the reluctance to shut down a historical relic will hinder this progress.  IE6 also contains a number of security vulnerabilities that continue to compound as the browser grows obsolete.  Luckily, large websites and even some governments (Germany) are finally dropping IE6 support, and Mashable has dedicated a tag to its demise: IE6 Must Die.  Even Microsoft has finally called for users to upgrade.

Click around and read some of the articles on Mashable.  You’ll see why we need to leave this thing behind in order to move forward.

While there has been some debate as to how effective this tactic is, anyone who runs their own blog or website can contribute in some small way by installing one of a number of plugins/apps that alert visitors still on IE6 to upgrade their browser.  Naturally, change is going to be spurred more rapidly by large sites with heavy traffic dropping support, but you know what they say about drops in a bucket.  Every one of them counts.

As of February 2010, IE6 still maintained around a 20% market share.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

9
Mar 10

Sci-Fi Western Short Film: “Connected”

Each year, the Academy Awards (mutual masturbation and all) awaken my dormant love for short film, and I begin concocting my own hair-brained plots and script ideas only to have them die slowly over the next few months.

GeekTyrant.com featured this project on their website, and it’s a great example of what you can do with the short format.  The cinematography is excellent.  The concept is simple along with the theme and resists the temptation to cram too much subtext into seven minutes.  All in all, Connected simply works and may remind you that pursuing that idea for a short you’ve had in your brain for the past five years might not be such a bad move.

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email

8
Mar 10

A Congress without Paper

I (admittedly) don’t pop over to OpenCongress as often as I should, but their post on the STOP the OverPrinting Act (H.R. 4640) caught my eye.  Introduced by Rep. Chris Lee [R, NY-26], the bill, if passed, would make print copies of Congressional bills available only upon request.  More information along with the full text of the bill is available via the link provided.

Over the past few years, I’ve taken great pains to cut down as much as possible on my own printing, and so far, I’ve whittled it down to about five pages per week in the office.  I’ve disconnected my printer at home and stowed it away.  I’m sure it’ll make a lovely museum piece one day.

If there is one thing that rankles me about working in an office, it’s the amount of information that should have been passed along to me in electronic form but was printed out and placed in my mailbox instead.  Aside from being wasteful, document handling is easier and more efficient on a computer.  I realize that there is a learning curve for those who didn’t grow up with computers, but all efforts should be made to handle information electronically.  As long as files are backed up properly and in  multiple locations, the advantages to using a printer become fewer and fewer.

As for the bill, I think this one passes the sniff test.  Of course, there are an endless number of things to be said about decreasing our energy usage and making electronic devices in general more efficient, but any step toward decreasing paper usage is probably a good one.

(Maybe we’ll get into the transition from printed to electronic books too.  However, that is a matter for another time.)

Share this with other foolish humans:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Slashdot
  • email